nilay patel

@reckless ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked May 20, 2022

Created

Mon May 09 23:08:13 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

nilay patel @reckless

@BrandonLive @marypcbuk I don’t know, I would have to read the case law to figure out the boundaries in 2022. “False advertising” means a lot of things to a lot of people, mere “puffery” is protected speech. The hairs, splitting endlessly — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 9, 2022

Preceded By

nilay patel @reckless

@BrandonLive @marypcbuk I am a lawyer and splitting hairs is what we do, especially when it comes to government speech regulations. If you want to do this, you have no choice but to split hairs, endlessly, forever — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 9, 2022

Followed By

nilay patel @reckless

@BrandonLive @marypcbuk Now shepardize this 40-year-old case and see where the boundaries have moved, heh. Also the core holding here is that commercial speech is protected and can only be banned in narrow ways — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 9, 2022