Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 12, 2019

Created

Wed Mar 07 16:45:02 +0000 2018

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

31/ So let's be clear: *no one signed this contract who asserted any right to speak for Trump*. Yet the contract makes countless—completely inoperative—legal representations *on Trump's behalf* and claims (entirely fictitiously) to *bind Trump* in numerous regards. Let's see how. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 7, 2018 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

30/ One thing the court may look at is the signature page—not only did Cohen try to give a slightly different signature the two times he signed, but more importantly he signs *only* as "EC, LLC" and "Attorney for Essential Consultants, LLC." He claims no right to speak for Trump. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 7, 2018 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

32/ Daniels was induced to sign the contract by Cohen's false representation in paragraph 2.3, in which he asserts legal authority to say Trump will "release any claims against [Daniels]" if Daniels agrees to do certain things. But in fact Trump was *not* so releasing any claims. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 7, 2018 Hibernated