Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 12, 2019

Created

Wed Mar 07 16:42:40 +0000 2018

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

30/ One thing the court may look at is the signature page—not only did Cohen try to give a slightly different signature the two times he signed, but more importantly he signs *only* as "EC, LLC" and "Attorney for Essential Consultants, LLC." He claims no right to speak for Trump. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 7, 2018 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

29/ In this view, the question becomes, did Cohen outsmart himself? By ensuring Trump *wasn't* a party to the contract and hiding his own identity (as EC LLC) did he falsely represent that EC LLC had the legal authority to make representations for Trump or bind him to a contract? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 7, 2018 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

31/ So let's be clear: *no one signed this contract who asserted any right to speak for Trump*. Yet the contract makes countless—completely inoperative—legal representations *on Trump's behalf* and claims (entirely fictitiously) to *bind Trump* in numerous regards. Let's see how. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 7, 2018 Hibernated