Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 12, 2019

Created

Tue Feb 27 15:32:49 +0000 2018

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

18/ Needless to say, she *could* plead the Fifth Amendment to get out of answering questions. Or—depending upon the agreement that led to her testimony—she *could* say Congress needs a new subpoena if they want her to answer questions she doesn't want to answer. But that's it. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 27, 2018 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

17/ In fact, as was the case with Bannon, almost all the questions Congress has for Hicks that involve Trump-Russia coordination involve events that *predate* Trump gaining executive privilege by entering the White House. She *should* be required to answer almost *all* questions. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 27, 2018 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

19/ Otherwise, she *cannot* refuse to answer questions about the campaign or transition on the basis of executive privilege, and as she's already spoken to Mueller for two days she can't use Bannon's excuse and say that a pending Mueller interview precludes her cooperating fully. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 27, 2018 Hibernated