Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 12, 2019

Created

Tue Feb 27 15:31:27 +0000 2018

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

17/ In fact, as was the case with Bannon, almost all the questions Congress has for Hicks that involve Trump-Russia coordination involve events that *predate* Trump gaining executive privilege by entering the White House. She *should* be required to answer almost *all* questions. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 27, 2018 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

16/ The *one* way in which Hicks will be treated identically to, say, Steve Bannon is that the media will pretend that Hicks has today—as an option—telling Congress that she's asserting one of several executive privileges in refusing to answer questions from members of the HPSCI. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 27, 2018 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

18/ Needless to say, she *could* plead the Fifth Amendment to get out of answering questions. Or—depending upon the agreement that led to her testimony—she *could* say Congress needs a new subpoena if they want her to answer questions she doesn't want to answer. But that's it. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 27, 2018 Hibernated