Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 12, 2019

Created

Fri Feb 02 19:06:44 +0000 2018

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

23/ A *third* legal error on just the *first page* of the memo is it says "all potentially favorable" information—i.e., favorable to the proposed warrant target—must be included in the warrant application. Uh, no, and moreover, this *never* happens in the criminal justice system. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 2, 2018 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

22/ If you doubt this, check out the work of Orin Kerr, who's done a lengthy analysis of the case law on this very issue (which is clearly something that the Nunes staffers working on behalf of Trump and Nunes did *not* do): https://t.co/aTGmOxeQCv — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 2, 2018 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

24/ Because we have an adversarial system of justice, and because the standard of proof to secure a warrant is so low, judges *never* expect (and almost *never* find) that the government included "all information potentially favorable to the defendant" in its warrant application. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 2, 2018 Hibernated