Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 12, 2019

Created

Fri Feb 02 19:04:38 +0000 2018

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

22/ If you doubt this, check out the work of Orin Kerr, who's done a lengthy analysis of the case law on this very issue (which is clearly something that the Nunes staffers working on behalf of Trump and Nunes did *not* do): https://t.co/aTGmOxeQCv — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 2, 2018 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

21/ The memo then makes *another* error of law on its first page: saying the law requires "all relevant and material facts" to be shown to a warrant-granting court. But that's not true. Many cases confirm that law enforcement can and does leave out key facts without repercussion. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 2, 2018 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

23/ A *third* legal error on just the *first page* of the memo is it says "all potentially favorable" information—i.e., favorable to the proposed warrant target—must be included in the warrant application. Uh, no, and moreover, this *never* happens in the criminal justice system. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 2, 2018 Hibernated