Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Sept. 7, 2022

Created

Mon Sep 05 20:54:12 +0000 2022

Likes

544

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

32/ So, you might wonder, should a judge be willing to spend more *money* on a case than usual because a defendant is famous? No. More *time*? No. These are inappropriate considerations. But what about the other three circumstances I just outlined? What of those? Do *they* apply? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 5, 2022

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

31/ They’re also rare because most cases involving seizures do not involve any even potentially privileged materials; judges can in theory engage in what are called in camera reviews of materials *without* a special master; and most defendants would never ask for *or* expect one. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 5, 2022

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

33/ Well...no, actually. Trump has made no showing whatsoever (or even claim) that the documents seized included attorney-client privileged materials, because of course he’s too busy trying to preserve a false defense that he didn’t even *know* what he stole from DC (yes—really). — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 5, 2022