Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Sept. 7, 2022

Created

Mon Sep 05 20:52:49 +0000 2022

Likes

567

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

31/ They’re also rare because most cases involving seizures do not involve any even potentially privileged materials; judges can in theory engage in what are called in camera reviews of materials *without* a special master; and most defendants would never ask for *or* expect one. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 5, 2022

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

30/ First, understand that across *all cases* in which documents are seized—at both the state and federal level—special masters are *obscenely* rare. Why? Because they’re expensive (taxpayer money) and time-consuming (they can prolong investigations and even pretrial detentions). — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 5, 2022

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

32/ So, you might wonder, should a judge be willing to spend more *money* on a case than usual because a defendant is famous? No. More *time*? No. These are inappropriate considerations. But what about the other three circumstances I just outlined? What of those? Do *they* apply? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 5, 2022