Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Sept. 7, 2022

Created

Mon Sep 05 20:39:33 +0000 2022

Likes

759

Retweets

148

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

22/ And Judge Cannon *confirmed* that this case *does* involve national security by permitting the *USIC* review of Trump’s theft of highly classified records to continue unimpeded. So was she saying the *DOJ* probe has no such need to continue, or national security implications? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 5, 2022

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

21/ So secondly you might ask, isn’t this case different because it involves national security? Answer: yes! We’ve a long tradition of dealing with cases that implicate national security differently in a host of ways—all of which (natch) are designed to protect national security. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 5, 2022

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

23/ This is, of course, a preposterous idea. There are immediate and dire national security implications in the question of whether or not DOJ’s counterintelligence division is going to be allowed to continue its investigation of one of the worst security breaches in our history. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 5, 2022