Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Sept. 7, 2022

Created

Mon Sep 05 20:37:59 +0000 2022

Likes

781

Retweets

149

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

21/ So secondly you might ask, isn’t this case different because it involves national security? Answer: yes! We’ve a long tradition of dealing with cases that implicate national security differently in a host of ways—all of which (natch) are designed to protect national security. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 5, 2022

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

20/ And to be clear, even if a judge thought DOJ’s new rules involving elections were *wise* and *just*, this wouldn’t be the same thing as institutionalizing them by judicial fiat. (And need we add that every Trump voter *opposed* such DOJ rules when it was Hillary under probe?) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 5, 2022

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

22/ And Judge Cannon *confirmed* that this case *does* involve national security by permitting the *USIC* review of Trump’s theft of highly classified records to continue unimpeded. So was she saying the *DOJ* probe has no such need to continue, or national security implications? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 5, 2022