Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked June 19, 2022

Created

Thu Jun 16 20:40:19 +0000 2022

Likes

549

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

If anything, the snit-fit DOJ is throwing makes the DOJ look bad, not the House January 6 Committee, as—I repeat—there’s really no question that these materials will be transferred to DOJ eventually. DOJ *mustn’t* use not having these materials as an excuse to slow-walk anything. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 16, 2022

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

I suspect this confusion will be cleared up this month, and that the transfer *will* begin happening. I think what just happened is that DOJ got frustrated enough about the *pace* of coordinating this transfer that it decided (maybe *unwisely*) to go public with that frustration. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 16, 2022

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

Having said this, *yes*, due to the JENCKS and BRADY cases, federal prosecutors *do* have a good reason to need to get these materials. My point is that DOJ going public with this private spat *in the middle of the HJ6C hearings* is simply not professional or appropriate. At all. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 16, 2022