Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked May 21, 2022

Created

Mon Dec 13 13:32:32 +0000 2021

Likes

252

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(PS11) So no, it’s not a defense of J.K. to claim the statutory definition of Rape versus Aggravated Felonious Sexual Assault is what she was focused on—as even if we had any evidence that she *was*, there’s no evidence booking documents influence the evidence presented at trial. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 13, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(PS10) In most jurisdictions a woman can be charged with Rape because penetration need not be with a penis. If where you live a woman would be charged with Aggravated Felonious Sexual Assault (not Rape) if she penetrates a man against his will, OK. It has nothing to do with this. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 13, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(PS12) And when I say that a woman can rape a man digitally or via a foreign object, the fact that in a given jurisdiction that particular felonious sexual assault might be charged as Aggravated Felonious Sexual Assault rather than Rape does not make it less egregious than Rape. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 13, 2021 Deleted after 38 seconds Hibernated Just a Typo