Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked May 21, 2022

Created

Mon Dec 13 13:30:34 +0000 2021

Likes

261

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(PS10) In most jurisdictions a woman can be charged with Rape because penetration need not be with a penis. If where you live a woman would be charged with Aggravated Felonious Sexual Assault (not Rape) if she penetrates a man against his will, OK. It has nothing to do with this. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 13, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(PS9) But the reason J.K. did not say “if a suspect is booked as a trans woman, the statutory element of penile penetration at a Rape trial cannot be proven” is because not only is that untrue but perhaps the stupidest f****** thing I’ve ever heard as a criminal defense attorney. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 13, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(PS11) So no, it’s not a defense of J.K. to claim the statutory definition of Rape versus Aggravated Felonious Sexual Assault is what she was focused on—as even if we had any evidence that she *was*, there’s no evidence booking documents influence the evidence presented at trial. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 13, 2021 Hibernated