Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Jan. 15, 2020

Created

Mon Dec 02 02:59:28 +0000 2019

Likes

382

Retweets

114

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

PS4/ But I'll take a consistent view in both cases, as in both cases you have the actions of the Trump administration on the one hand and the investigative needs of law enforcement on the other: Trumpists *obstructed* the Mueller probe, and they're *obstructing* this impeachment. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 2, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

PS3/ As I recall, back then THE HILL ignored the "missing" evidence—as calling attention to it would've underscored that investigators had *much* more to do and the Mueller Report wasn't the "end" of anything. And it would've forced THE HILL to clock a huge volume of obstruction. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 2, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

PS5/ So Democrats should reject the idea of "missing" witnesses, as so should THE HILL if it wants to remain neutral. Democrats have the evidence they have—and it's *overwhelming*, objectively speaking—while Trump and his team *obstructed* the disclosure of *additional* evidence. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 2, 2019 Hibernated