Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Jan. 15, 2020

Created

Mon Dec 02 02:58:21 +0000 2019

Likes

294

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

PS3/ As I recall, back then THE HILL ignored the "missing" evidence—as calling attention to it would've underscored that investigators had *much* more to do and the Mueller Report wasn't the "end" of anything. And it would've forced THE HILL to clock a huge volume of obstruction. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 2, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

PS2/ For instance, Mueller opined early on in his report that Trump advisers, allies, agents, and associates had—variously—refused to be interviewed, withheld evidence, destroyed evidence, and lied about their actions and knowledge. Was that "missing" evidence—or obstruction? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 2, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

PS4/ But I'll take a consistent view in both cases, as in both cases you have the actions of the Trump administration on the one hand and the investigative needs of law enforcement on the other: Trumpists *obstructed* the Mueller probe, and they're *obstructing* this impeachment. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 2, 2019 Hibernated