Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked June 25, 2019

Created

Thu Apr 18 17:56:33 +0000 2019

Likes

713

Retweets

157

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

186/ So what Mueller was looking at was, was there a tacit/express agreement to have Trump give Russia good policy *in exchange for* aid to his campaign—oddly, an allegation no one has really made. The question is whether he aided and abetted Russia *after* he knew of its crimes. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 18, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

185/ The first issue is Mueller's framing: he asks if Russia "provide[d] assistance to the campaign" in exchange for "favorable treatment," which is a way of saying "did they commit crimes" because they knew "Trump would give them good policy," which we already know is a "yes." https://t.co/6xXe7Ba5Qu — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 18, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

187/ So, say Trump created a historically pro-Russia foreign policy—trillions in unilateral benefits to Russia, with no purpose for the US—to help him do business deals in Russia. Then Russia started helping him, and he learned that, and *kept helping them*—inducing more crimes. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 18, 2019 Hibernated