Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked June 25, 2019

Created

Thu Apr 18 17:55:19 +0000 2019

Likes

730

Retweets

150

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

185/ The first issue is Mueller's framing: he asks if Russia "provide[d] assistance to the campaign" in exchange for "favorable treatment," which is a way of saying "did they commit crimes" because they knew "Trump would give them good policy," which we already know is a "yes." https://t.co/6xXe7Ba5Qu — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 18, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

184/ I'm at pg. 70 now, in a pretty responsible amount of time, I think (about a couple hours). This is where the section on Trump-Russia contacts truly begins, and is the most important part of the whole Report, in my estimation (the obstruction section is largely public info). — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 18, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

186/ So what Mueller was looking at was, was there a tacit/express agreement to have Trump give Russia good policy *in exchange for* aid to his campaign—oddly, an allegation no one has really made. The question is whether he aided and abetted Russia *after* he knew of its crimes. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 18, 2019 Hibernated