Seth Dillon

@SethDillon ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Oct. 29, 2022

Created

Mon Oct 03 14:20:25 +0000 2022

Likes

293

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Dillon @SethDillon

The case SCOTUS will hear is interesting because it has to do with content recommendation algorithms. To what extent should social media companies be liable for messaging they promote by recommending it algorithmically? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 3, 2022

Preceded By

Seth Dillon @SethDillon

It seems to me they should be immune because they aren't speaking when they host the speech of others. They're carriers/conduits. But then they shouldn't be able to censor viewpoints by claiming a 1A right to not carry unwanted messages. As carriers, they aren't speakers. — PolitiTweet.org

@lawrencehurley @SethDillon I don’t get it. Tech companies SHOULD have immunity for what their users post. Just lik… https://t.co/7sjdCtb8mA

Posted Oct. 3, 2022

Followed By

Seth Dillon @SethDillon

To be clear, I'm not suggesting they shouldn't be able to moderate at all. Section 230 allows for moderation of the indecent/obscene or unlawful. But it shouldn't give them the ability to take down viewpoints they don't like while calling it "hate speech" or "misinformation." — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 3, 2022