Profile Image

Seth Dillon

@SethDillon ↗

Deleted No
Hibernated No
Last Checked Oct. 29, 2022

Created

Mon Oct 03 14:20:25 +0000 2022

Likes

490

Retweets

46

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available
Profile Image

Seth Dillon @SethDillon

It seems to me they should be immune because they aren't speaking when they host the speech of others. They're carriers/conduits. But then they shouldn't be able to censor viewpoints by claiming a 1A right to not carry unwanted messages. As carriers, they aren't speakers. — PolitiTweet.org

Siyume @Siyume69

@lawrencehurley @SethDillon I don’t get it. Tech companies SHOULD have immunity for what their users post. Just lik… https://t.co/7sjdCtb8mA

Posted Oct. 3, 2022

Preceded By

Profile Image

Seth Dillon @SethDillon

RT @lawrencehurley: NEW: Supreme Court agrees to hear case challenging immunity of tech companies under Section 230 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 3, 2022 Retweet

Followed By

Profile Image

Seth Dillon @SethDillon

The case SCOTUS will hear is interesting because it has to do with content recommendation algorithms. To what extent should social media companies be liable for messaging they promote by recommending it algorithmically? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 3, 2022