Sheldon Whitehouse

@SenWhitehouse ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Jan. 12, 2022

Created

Wed Dec 08 21:09:03 +0000 2021

Likes

154

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Sheldon Whitehouse @SenWhitehouse

Flotillas of orchestrated dark-money “amici curiae” appear before the Court without revealing who they’re fronting for; it’s serious enough for the Judicial Conference to set up a committee to examine the problem. But it’s not mentioned here. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 8, 2021

Preceded By

Sheldon Whitehouse @SenWhitehouse

If anonymous donors wrote checks for $15 million and more to influence judicial selection through dark-money political advertising campaigns, without disclosing their business before the Court, we’d have something to say about that. Not here. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 8, 2021

Followed By

Sheldon Whitehouse @SenWhitehouse

We are up to 80 partisan 5-4 decisions from the Court that provided obvious wins for big Republican donor interests. The pattern demands explanation. You won’t find it mentioned here. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 8, 2021