Sheldon Whitehouse

@SenWhitehouse ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Jan. 12, 2022

Created

Wed Dec 08 21:09:02 +0000 2021

Likes

153

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Sheldon Whitehouse @SenWhitehouse

If anonymous donors wrote checks for $15 million and more to influence judicial selection through dark-money political advertising campaigns, without disclosing their business before the Court, we’d have something to say about that. Not here. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 8, 2021

Preceded By

Sheldon Whitehouse @SenWhitehouse

If another country had given its judicial selection over to a private, partisan group, while that partisan group was taking massive anonymous private donations, we’d have something to say about the obvious dangers of that. Not here. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 8, 2021

Followed By

Sheldon Whitehouse @SenWhitehouse

Flotillas of orchestrated dark-money “amici curiae” appear before the Court without revealing who they’re fronting for; it’s serious enough for the Judicial Conference to set up a committee to examine the problem. But it’s not mentioned here. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 8, 2021