Daniel Dale

@ddale8 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Sept. 22, 2021

Created

Tue Apr 27 18:15:04 +0000 2021

Likes

234

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Daniel Dale @ddale8

Here is how the New York Post (left) and Forbes (right) covered the *initial* Abrams op-ed. It was clear to good-faith readers that the op-ed was against an immediate boycott, even before Abrams softened some of her language in the revised version for the print paper days later. https://t.co/YP17PqRMpb — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 27, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

Daniel Dale @ddale8

In other words: My fact check, (https://t.co/e23kSnefv4) was always on the initial Abrams op-ed, not the revised version that ran later in print. And that initial op-ed -- in a section Whitlock omitted from this tweet -- also made clear she opposed an immediate Georgia boycott. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 27, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

Daniel Dale @ddale8

This is a straight lie. I didn't "miss her stealth edits." I explicitly noted in my piece that Abrams' op-ed was revised after initial publication -- and, for fairness to Tom Cotton, I based my piece on her initial words, not her revised words. https://t.co/H5xiOqtcp9 — PolitiTweet.org

@TheBadNewsB @ddale8 He literally doesn't, I included what he said I omitted in the second tweet in the thread, he'… https://t.co/g9jL5Mw9hw

Posted April 27, 2021 Hibernated