Daniel Dale

@ddale8 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Sept. 22, 2021

Created

Tue Apr 27 18:04:23 +0000 2021

Likes

432

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Daniel Dale @ddale8

In other words: My fact check, (https://t.co/e23kSnefv4) was always on the initial Abrams op-ed, not the revised version that ran later in print. And that initial op-ed -- in a section Whitlock omitted from this tweet -- also made clear she opposed an immediate Georgia boycott. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 27, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

Daniel Dale @ddale8

This Whitlock tweet is really deceptive. 1) I noted the edits in my fact check. 2) He left out a critical chunk of the initial Abrams op-ed, the part where she said she doesn't want an immediate GA boycott. Blue: what he included. Red: what he omitted. https://t.co/I2G0pu5x3J https://t.co/sH0NU6nsS6 — PolitiTweet.org

The op-ed Dale and others cite defending Abrams was heavily edited from its original version AFTER the MLB decided… https://t.co/eEEfO7eAJv

Posted April 27, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

Daniel Dale @ddale8

Here is how the New York Post (left) and Forbes (right) covered the *initial* Abrams op-ed. It was clear to good-faith readers that the op-ed was against an immediate boycott, even before Abrams softened some of her language in the revised version for the print paper days later. https://t.co/YP17PqRMpb — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 27, 2021 Hibernated