Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin

@JRubinBlogger ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Oct. 9, 2022

Created

Thu Sep 22 01:25:03 +0000 2022

Likes

24,917

Retweets

2,660

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Not a good day for Aileen Cannon.11th circuit essentially shoots down each of her awful rulings starting with equitable relief. Restores one's confidence in the judiciary — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 22, 2022

Preceded By

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

RT @PostOpinions: Why it’s not critical race theory to say Hitler admired U.S. racism, @KWoodsome discusses it with Ken Burns, Lynn Novick… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 21, 2022 Retweet

Followed By

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

First, as we have explained, Plaintiff does not have a possessory interest in the documents at issue, so he does not suffer a cognizable harm if the United States reviews documents he neither owns nor has a personal interest in. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 22, 2022