Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin

@JRubinBlogger ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 24, 2022

Created

Mon Mar 21 23:35:07 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@HawleyMO good! — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 21, 2022

Preceded By

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

White male senators jumped to the conclusion that picking a Black woman would lead to a less qualified candidate. Anyone who's been a "first" understands this is 1) ignorant if not impossible (the standards are SO much higher) 2) reflective of bias disfavored groups face — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 21, 2022

Followed By

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@KevinMKruse Bork was no victim. He was an extreme, weird nominee. 6 R's voting no is unprecedented. D's voted to confirm later R nominees. Clarence Thomas got 11 D votes. False memory of R-nominated judges reflects media bubble they populate where old grievances are chewed over endlessly — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 21, 2022