Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin

@JRubinBlogger ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Feb. 24, 2022

Created

Sun Feb 13 16:23:53 +0000 2022

Likes

787

Retweets

179

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Aside from “Who cares if Susan Collins votes for the nominee?,” the response to pleas for an equivocating, timid justice is simple: Bipartisanship has proved to be a one-way street, which is not a goal unto itself. Moreover, the stakes have changed https://t.co/jNs0nI9FNs — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 13, 2022

Preceded By

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Ds would be wise, for once, to go after what THEY want: a justice with expansive view of constit rights to defend voting , access to abortion, and gun safety consistent with 2ndA. These are worthy constitutional goals and politically popular, to boot. https://t.co/jNs0nI9FNs — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 13, 2022

Followed By

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Democracy defenders and civil rights advocates should aim to seed dissents with stinging rebukes of judicial arrogance, dissents that over time can provide the framework for recapturing the constitutional rights and judicial legitimacy this court has sabotaged. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 13, 2022