PolitiTweet Archive
Home Figures About
Donate
Profile Image

Brian Fung | @[email protected]

@b_fung ↗

  • Overview
  • Archive
  • Deleted
Deleted No
Hibernated No
Last Checked Jan. 3, 2022

Created

Tue Aug 17 15:18:45 +0000 2021

Likes

9

Retweets

1

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available
Profile Image

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

YouTube didn't answer our question about whether it factors in the Treasury sanctions list in its enforcement decision-making, but said the company has a bunch of rules around violent criminal organizations and that those rules apply to the Taliban. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 17, 2021

Preceded By

Profile Image

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

In its initial answer to our questions, YouTube said it relied on governments to define FTOs, and linked to the State Department FTO list. Which seemed to suggest — because the Afghan Taliban is not on that list — YouTube actually is fine with the Taliban. We asked for clarity. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 17, 2021

Followed By

Profile Image

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

Stuff like terrorist promotional videos, recruitment videos and hostage videos are prohibited on YouTube, and so if a Taliban account is seen posting that stuff, it's supposed to get enforced against, but hypothetically, a Taliban account not posting those things could be fine. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 17, 2021

© 2025 Politiwatch. Tweets and other media belong to their indicated owners; all other materials are licensed CC-BY-SA. If you use PolitiTweet professionally, please feel free to let us know. Note that PolitiTweet stopped archiving new tweets on April 3, 2023, when Twitter disabled our API access.