Brian Fung | @[email protected]

@b_fung ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Jan. 3, 2022

Created

Tue Aug 17 15:15:57 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

In its initial answer to our questions, YouTube said it relied on governments to define FTOs, and linked to the State Department FTO list. Which seemed to suggest — because the Afghan Taliban is not on that list — YouTube actually is fine with the Taliban. We asked for clarity. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 17, 2021

Preceded By

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

Similar to Facebook, YouTube also told CNN that it relies on government definitions of terrorist groups to inform its enforcement decisions. But unlike Facebook, YouTube does not appear to have a blanket ban on the Afghan Taliban. The platform's answers were tougher to parse. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 17, 2021

Followed By

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

YouTube didn't answer our question about whether it factors in the Treasury sanctions list in its enforcement decision-making, but said the company has a bunch of rules around violent criminal organizations and that those rules apply to the Taliban. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 17, 2021