Brian Fung | @[email protected]

@b_fung ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Nov. 10, 2022

Created

Wed Jun 17 18:45:36 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

And it seems that DOJ would like “bad faith” to cover conduct that makes it harder for law enforcement to get content "in a comprehensible, readable and usable format” — which seems pretty clearly a reference to **encryption.** https://t.co/oEst7Mzh4u — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

But where the latter two complain about “good faith” curation as a matter of political speech, DOJ’s proposal focuses more on creating a “bad faith” exception to 230 rooted in willful ignorance of illegal content. https://t.co/PaQp3QZ1jh — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

Compare this to the EARN IT Act, which envisioned a new committee that would create “best practices” for the industry to “earn” back the protections it enjoys under 230. Silicon Valley feared this committee would make banning encryption a “best practice." — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2020 Hibernated