Brian Fung | @[email protected]

@b_fung ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Nov. 10, 2022

Created

Wed Jun 17 18:41:54 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

But where the latter two complain about “good faith” curation as a matter of political speech, DOJ’s proposal focuses more on creating a “bad faith” exception to 230 rooted in willful ignorance of illegal content. https://t.co/PaQp3QZ1jh — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

A key theme in the DOJ proposal is that platforms should not be eligible for 230 immunity if they’re operating in “bad faith.” This theme — critiquing 230’s Good Samaritan provision — also appears in Sen. Hawley’s bill today and Trump’s executive order. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

And it seems that DOJ would like “bad faith” to cover conduct that makes it harder for law enforcement to get content "in a comprehensible, readable and usable format” — which seems pretty clearly a reference to **encryption.** https://t.co/oEst7Mzh4u — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2020 Hibernated