Mark S. Zaid

@MarkSZaidEsq ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Jan. 28, 2021

Created

Thu Oct 01 17:04:43 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

5/We have always known this, but before #Bolton case USGOVT NEVER went after anyone for simply giving manuscript to third parties PRIOR to publication. So long as book was not "published", no infringement was pursued. Now, it will always be different. You are on notice. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 1, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

4/"complaint sufficiently alleges that Bolton violated his prepublication review obligation by sharing his manuscript before the review ended." This sentence made situation worse for ALL future NatSec authors. Giving manuscript to attny, literary agent or publisher is violation. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 1, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

6/"SCI agreements require swift action: the government must make an initial response to a submission within thirty working days." Modern courts rarely allowed us to argue USGOVT violated its contractual obligations by delaying review. Usually 30 days not reasonable. This helps. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 1, 2020 Hibernated