Mark S. Zaid

@MarkSZaidEsq ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Nov. 7, 2020

Created

Thu Jul 02 03:47:16 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

1,612

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

RT @SykesCharlie: Ghastly news for Trump in these new battleground polls. https://t.co/TuGPS3jyXh — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 2, 2020 Retweet Hibernated

Preceded By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

I was wondering why Simon & Schuster was originally covered by the TRO. Perhaps damages are available against Trump's niece for violating NDA, although that is still to be decided, but publisher wasn't party to that contract. This is the correct legal ruling. — PolitiTweet.org

➡️ NEW: “Justice Scheinkman ruled that Simon & Schuster was not a party to — and thus could not be bound by — the c… https://t.co/O7dpv…

Posted July 2, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

RT @CNNTonight: A New York appellate court vacated a temporary restraining order against Simon & Schuster, the publisher of President Trump… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 2, 2020 Retweet Hibernated