Profile Image

Mark S. Zaid

@MarkSZaidEsq ↗

Deleted No
Hibernated Yes
Last Checked Nov. 7, 2020

Created

Thu Jul 02 01:29:23 +0000 2020

Likes

133

Retweets

34

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available
Profile Image

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

I was wondering why Simon & Schuster was originally covered by the TRO. Perhaps damages are available against Trump's niece for violating NDA, although that is still to be decided, but publisher wasn't party to that contract. This is the correct legal ruling. — PolitiTweet.org

Katie Phang @KatiePhang

➡️ NEW: “Justice Scheinkman ruled that Simon & Schuster was not a party to — and thus could not be bound by — the c… https://t.co/O7dpv…

Posted July 2, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Profile Image

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

RT @MeTV: Join MeTV in celebrating the life of Carl Reiner with episodes of The Dick Van Dyke show hand-picked by the man himself! This Sun… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 2, 2020 Retweet Hibernated

Followed By

Profile Image

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

RT @SykesCharlie: Ghastly news for Trump in these new battleground polls. https://t.co/TuGPS3jyXh — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 2, 2020 Retweet Hibernated