Mark S. Zaid

@MarkSZaidEsq ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Oct. 24, 2020

Created

Wed Jun 17 21:32:49 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

@BoutrousTed @NormEisen disputed passages contain information that is not in the public domain. Accordingly, the Court upholds the classification decisions of the federal government and denies Stillman's First Amendment claims." — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

@BoutrousTed @NormEisen .Stillman's manuscript could reasonably be expected to cause serious damage to national security, create a serious risk to intelligence sources and methods, and/or cause significant strategic and diplomatic setbacks to the United States. The Court also is convinced that the .. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

@BoutrousTed @NormEisen That was all from Stillman v. CIA et al., 517 F. Supp. 2d 32 (D.D.C. 2007). Quotes were mostly from DC Cir though. Who was the Judge? #EmmetSullivan — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2020 Hibernated