Mark S. Zaid

@MarkSZaidEsq ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Oct. 24, 2020

Created

Wed Jun 17 21:32:41 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

@BoutrousTed @NormEisen .Stillman's manuscript could reasonably be expected to cause serious damage to national security, create a serious risk to intelligence sources and methods, and/or cause significant strategic and diplomatic setbacks to the United States. The Court also is convinced that the .. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

@BoutrousTed @NormEisen ..has properly classified the twenty-three disputed passages in Stillman's manuscript. The affidavits provided by officials from the Central Intelligence Agency, Department of Defense and Defense Intelligence Agency give the Court reason to believe that the censored portions of . — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

@BoutrousTed @NormEisen disputed passages contain information that is not in the public domain. Accordingly, the Court upholds the classification decisions of the federal government and denies Stillman's First Amendment claims." — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2020 Hibernated