Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 16, 2019

Created

Tue Nov 15 14:59:07 +0000 2016

Likes

656

Retweets

140

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

So I can buy that Bush '00—lots of money, great ground game—would have won under a pure popular vote. Doesn't work for Trump '16 really. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 15, 2016 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

The Electoral College serves to constrain financial & ground game advantages, because you encounter diminishing returns in the swing states. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 15, 2016 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

RT @jtemplon: This is really important. In raw numbers turnout is up already. By percentage it's down just slightly (right now) from 2012.… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 15, 2016 Retweet Hibernated