Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 16, 2019

Created

Sun Oct 30 13:19:30 +0000 2016

Likes

160

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Nominally that map is a 270-268 win for Clinton but that counts ME-2, which would be vulnerable. But Trump maybe vulnerable in NE-2 and UT. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 30, 2016 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Not totally crazy to think Clinton could win NV and NC but lose PA, FL and NH (and OH and IA). That would yield an... interesting map. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 30, 2016 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@allahpundit: Probably not but there's almost no early voting in PA. So if there's a big, late shift against Clinton, it's more vulnerable. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 30, 2016 Hibernated