Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 8, 2023

Created

Fri Jan 13 23:11:56 +0000 2023

Likes

133

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@BenjySarlin According to #science it would be the size of a hockey puck. https://t.co/KC2uvPEzt3 — PolitiTweet.org

@TheStalwart @markets Joe this has been bugging me all day, there's actually a pretty strong (although logarithmic… https://t.co/PliNFV8GzS

Posted Jan. 13, 2023

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@KevinZollman In poker you'll sometimes hear people say this when they're contemplating a "big" fold or call that relies on physical reads or other hard-to-articulate intuitions about an opponent's hand strength. In my experience they're usually right, i.e. was the rational decision. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 13, 2023

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@DKarol If the parties are more extreme though you'd expect to have fewer swing voters I think? It's more likely that at least one of the parties is unacceptably far away from you on some key issues. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 13, 2023