Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Oct. 3, 2022

Created

Sat Aug 13 19:05:04 +0000 2022

Likes

604

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

This article is full of terrible statistical logic. Yes, it's hard to *exactly* quantify the risk of a highly deadly nuclear accident. By nature, tail events are rare. There is *intrinsically* some guesswork. But empirically the chances are *very* low. https://t.co/ccrM72DFRb https://t.co/t6PbSLEj5T — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 13, 2022

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@Yascha_Mounk To be fair, it's hard to think of friends of mine who *haven't* had a fatwa issued against them and then randomly been stabbed while giving a book talk in upstate New York. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 13, 2022

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

The author also blatantly cheats by counting Fukushima as 3 separate accidents, as though they occurred independently from one another and didn't have a common cause like oh I dunno a magnitude 9 earthquake. https://t.co/9vke8dd8Al — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 13, 2022