Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Aug. 16, 2021

Created

Tue Aug 03 06:20:12 +0000 2021

Likes

1,330

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Also as in the Provincetown study it's a convenience sample, meaning people who chose to be tested, and not a random sample of all infections. That likely biases the sample toward more severe infections since people with more severe symptoms are more likely to seek out testing. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 3, 2021

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

The sample size is this non peer reviewed study is 79 vaccinated people (corrected, misread as 83 before) and completely lacks the statistical power to differentiate between vaccinated and unvaccinanted people. — PolitiTweet.org

More data in support of viral loads being the same in vaccinated and unvaccinated people, this time from Wisconsin: https://t.co/RiPbOhmwXR

Posted Aug. 3, 2021

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@jeremyfaust No, same issues with sample size in the Singapore study too. The confidence intervals on the Ct values are very wide (see below). Also big demographic differences between the vaxxed and unvaxxed group (note age and gender makeup). https://t.co/NJpukQb4ZQ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 3, 2021