Profile Image

Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No
Hibernated No
Last Checked July 26, 2021

Created

Sat Jun 19 17:38:07 +0000 2021

Likes

213

Retweets

14

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available
Profile Image

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Although Yang and Garcia are *somewhat* ideologically compatible, this is likely much more of a tactical decision: RCV gives the 2nd, 3rd and 4th place candidates (Garcia, Yang, Wiley in some order) a lot of incentive to coordinate against the 1st place candidate (Adams). — PolitiTweet.org

Stephen Wolf @PoliticsWolf

This isn’t a flaw: Ending zero-sum politics & encouraging more positive campaigning is one of the main purposes of… https://t.co/L4RCRr…

Posted June 19, 2021

Preceded By

Profile Image

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

This is pretty clearly a smart move for both Garcia and Yang. Also arguably a flaw in ranked choice voting that these sorts of strategic alliances can matter. — PolitiTweet.org

Tina Nguyen @tina_nguyen

According to a staffer, 40,000 of these leaflets are being distributed to Yang and Garcia’s respective strongholds… https://t.co/hvYab2wn6m

Posted June 19, 2021

Followed By

Profile Image

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

So it's still zero sum: Garcia and Yang are improving their chances by weakening Adams's and Wiley's. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 19, 2021