Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Jan. 7, 2021

Created

Sun Dec 20 00:52:41 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@kdrum I'm not sure what we're arguing about? It's completely insane IMO to not put 65+ ahead of pre-existing conditions (perhaps with some very precise exceptions, but most pre-existing conditions aren't remotely as much of a risk factor for severe disease as age). — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 20, 2020

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@kdrum It isn't in the ACIP recommendations. Some states are sensible enough to be prioritizing age, though. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 20, 2020

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@kdrum You're looking at the wrong slide on averted deaths. Give that we have a disease-blocking vaccine and not just an infection-blocking one, you need to look at slide 21, which shows a lot of lives would be saved by prioritizing the elderly. https://t.co/Frnr4iFSoe — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 20, 2020