Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Jan. 6, 2021

Created

Fri Dec 18 15:54:06 +0000 2020

Likes

246

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

There's going to be a **lot** of this happening if you define a very broad set of preexisting conditions as deserving higher priority for vaccines. It's a huge, avoidable mistake. https://t.co/vWE5xTTKGK https://t.co/sZesgR1I2n — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 18, 2020

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

But ACIP defines *more than 100m people* as having "high-risk medical conditions" that put them in the same priority tier as people age 65+ for vaccination. This is NOT following the science. States that want to save lives must give age higher priority. https://t.co/mdccG7VHXl https://t.co/iFit37Kd74 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 18, 2020

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

RT @kwcollins: Not only is prioritizing by age good on the merits, it's also helpful politically, because it's a well-defined bright line t… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 18, 2020 Retweet