Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked April 27, 2021

Created

Fri Sep 11 16:46:54 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@NickRiccardi @BenjySarlin I think it's important to distinguish between a vaccine being *approved* and one being widely *available*. So I don't object to that. The stuff though where it's like "even if a vaccine reduces severe illness by 75%, we'll still have to TKTK"...I don't know how rational that is. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 11, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@BenjySarlin Actually you see a lot of the opposite conversation, i.e. "we'll still have to be careful even after a vaccine", which I think is both unhelpful psychologically and possibly wrong policywise (depending on details but at some point there becomes an acceptable level of risk IMO). — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 11, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@BenjySarlin @NickRiccardi I also think people's patience with closures will continue to erode over time. So that's another reason to frontload measures even if you have to put an explicit time frame on them. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 11, 2020 Hibernated