Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Oct. 12, 2020

Created

Fri Apr 24 20:10:24 +0000 2020

Likes

184

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

This is separate from the false positives issue which renders the study ~unusable on its own. The study is a mess, overall. You'd think Stanford profs would know better. Still, it's not obvious in which direction the biases from their sampling strategy would run. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 24, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

If the Santa Clara study was asking for healthy volunteers and recruiting in wealthy, well-connected neighborhoods, that's definitely going to bias the results, but I'm not sure if it biases them toward overestimation (possibly underestimation instead). https://t.co/QXpat6wUxf https://t.co/qkrH8gMj6v — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 24, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Honestly there should just be an @UpshotNYT / Siena seroprevalence study. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 24, 2020 Hibernated