Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Oct. 7, 2020

Created

Fri Apr 24 16:30:10 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Another one: some studies are only conducted among purportedly asymptomatic people. If, say, 10% of *asymptomatic* people in a given population test positive, the overall rate of disease (symptomatic + asymptomatic people) will be higher. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 24, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

One thing right off the bat is that many of these studies don't include minors. Since children are less likely to have COVID-19, excluding them will tend to bias the reported infection rate upward from the true rate throughout the population. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 24, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Also, it's hard to do a TRULY random study. For instance, NY's process seems to be something like: they set up stations at randomly-selected grocery stores. But what happens *within* those stores is less clear and there is probably some degree of self-selection. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 24, 2020 Hibernated