Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Sept. 22, 2020

Created

Thu Apr 09 03:04:37 +0000 2020

Likes

1,366

Retweets

522

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

So... now there are a pair of studies confirming by suspicion that coronavirus was spreading in NYC by mid-late February. https://t.co/GMxLyCxdaE https://t.co/xyyL32vcvS — PolitiTweet.org

It's clear that things people were seeing a *lot* of symptoms by the 2nd week in March, which implies a lot of comm… https://t.co/hbBEjfD0mL

Posted April 9, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@mattyglesias Yeah, and it's like... there was a lot of academic/epidemiological discussion about coronavirus and weather a month or so ago. And now there should be a *lot* more data on it (with outbreaks or lack thereof in more countries) and there's much less. It's a bit weird. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 9, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

In some ways, although it would make de Blasio look even worse, an earlier introduction would be good news for NYC in the sense that it explains why there's so much COVID-19 in the city for reasons that may have less to do with density or other intrinsic properties of NYC. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 9, 2020 Hibernated