Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked May 28, 2020

Created

Wed Jan 29 04:40:10 +0000 2020

Likes

203

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

I'm trying to figure out the equilibrium strategy re: Iowa caucus alliances. I think the equilibrium does *not* involve forming alliances with the frontrunners (Sanders, Biden) because helping the frontrunners makes it even harder to overtake them. https://t.co/d6G2QTGZzA https://t.co/2CTlye3cEi — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 29, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

FWIW you can caucus as uncommitted on the first alignment; you don't need to pick a candidate initially. (Although,… https://t.co/16DQgi7ven — PolitiTweet.org

FWIW: This man is planning to caucus for Delaney on first alignment because he thinks he won’t be viable in his pre… https://t.co/srIWnl2oDU

Posted Jan. 29, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

That would imply the most viable alliances are between some combination of Buttigieg, Warren and Klobuchar, who are (1) all competing for somewhat overlapping groups pf voters, and (2) are all in pretty bad shape unless they can finish ahead of *at least one* of the frontrunners. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 29, 2020 Deleted Hibernated Just a Typo