Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked May 11, 2020

Created

Mon Dec 30 20:03:31 +0000 2019

Likes

372

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

One minor thing: I'd like to see the Dems' delegate allocation give more of a bonus to state winners instead of being *so* proportional, especially later in the process. e.g. maybe for primaries after April 1, 30% of a state's delegates are winner-take-all; 40% after May 1, etc — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 30, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

FWIW, I think the party nomination systems are reasonably well-designed and having a sequential nomination process is more robust in many respects than having all elections on one day. The biggest flaw IMO is that the same non-representative states (IA/NH) always go first. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 30, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

That would balance out the incentives for states between going early and late and could help a candidate who emerged as a frontrunner midway through the process to have a clearer victory without needing a contested convention, etc. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 30, 2019 Hibernated